Listed employees
829
Complete population represented in the source disclosure.
← Back to portfolio
Data engineering and analytical storytelling
Anonymized Workforce Selection Analysis
A portfolio case study showing how a structured disclosure can become a validated, interactive decision experience while preserving privacy and clearly communicating statistical limitations.
PDF extractionData validationPrivacy thresholdsInteractive analyticsStatistical comparison
The analytical challenge
Turn a dense legal disclosure into clear, responsible evidence.
The source contained 829 anonymous employee records across 144 exact job titles. The workflow reconciled every row, defined the outcome carefully, grouped ages, calculated comparison rates and uncertainty, then removed granular records before publication.
Interactive cohort view
Workforce selection overview
Age-band selection changes the headline metrics and eligibility composition.
Listed
829
Eligible
158
Selection rate
19.1%
Selected and eligible
158
Records meeting the disclosure's Eligible definition.
Selection rate
19.06%
Eligible records divided by all listed records in the selected scope.
Distinct source titles
144
Only five privacy-qualified groups are displayed below.
Eligibility composition
Eligible158
19.1% of the selected scope
Ineligible671
80.9% of the selected scope
Selection rate by age band
22-2911.4% · 5/44
30-3918.3% · 39/213
40-4919.0% · 51/268
50-5921.0% · 42/200
60+20.2% · 21/104
Selection rates by protected-age group
Under 4017.1% · 44/257
Age 40+19.9% · 114/572
Aggregate rate difference
Age 40+ minus under 40
+2.81 pts
- Age 40+
- 19.9% (114/572)
- Under 40
- 17.1% (44/257)
- 95% interval
- -2.84 to 8.46 pts
- Two-sided p-value
- 0.341
The observed aggregate difference is not statistically clear at the conventional 5% threshold.
Privacy-qualified job-title groups
Enterprise Platforms Product Manager36.0%
Senior QA Automation Test Engineer24.0%
Senior Application Development Engineer23.8%
Senior Business Systems Analyst20.7%
Application Development Engineer II18.5%
A title is displayed only when at least 10 employees are listed and both outcome cells contain at least five employees.
Selected title context
Senior Application Development Engineer
Listed
42
Eligible
10
Ineligible
32
Rate
23.8%
What this public dashboard excludes
- • No names, employee identifiers, exact ages, source pages, or employee-level records.
- • No employer name, original filename, source document, or unique job-title group.
- • No title group with fewer than 10 listed employees or fewer than five people in either outcome.
These are descriptive aggregates from one decisional unit. They do not explain individual decisions or provide a legal conclusion.
Reconciled source
829 records reconcile to 158 Eligible and 671 Ineligible outcomes.
Public-safe grain
The published experience contains only aggregates. Exact ages and employee-level rows are excluded.
Interpretation boundary
Aggregate comparisons describe the listed population but do not explain individual decisions or establish a legal conclusion.